Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

925

More permanent housing requirements over time would solve the housing crisis by making all new structures contribute to the total housing in the system

Personally, I don't see a house as an investment when it's made out of materials that degrade after 50 years.

The land isn't worth that much and the cost of rebuilding or major repairs every 50 years means it's not an investment.

Right now housing is being sold for insane hyperinflated prices, and they're not even made to last.

More permanent housing requirements over time would solve the housing crisis by making all new structures contribute to the total housing in the system Personally, I don't see a house as an investment when it's made out of materials that degrade after 50 years. The land isn't worth that much and the cost of rebuilding or major repairs every 50 years means it's not an investment. Right now housing is being sold for insane hyperinflated prices, and they're not even made to last.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (34).
[–] • 0 pt

i think foreigners owning property is fine but only if they are directly living on said property,

[–] • 2 pts

That would mean foreigners owning land and being in the country which is even worse.

[–] • 2 pts

Hard disagree. I don't think any non-citizen should be allowed to own land. Let them lease it.

[–] • 0 pt

I think it would be a net loss.