WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

312

More permanent housing requirements over time would solve the housing crisis by making all new structures contribute to the total housing in the system

Personally, I don't see a house as an investment when it's made out of materials that degrade after 50 years.

The land isn't worth that much and the cost of rebuilding or major repairs every 50 years means it's not an investment.

Right now housing is being sold for insane hyperinflated prices, and they're not even made to last.

More permanent housing requirements over time would solve the housing crisis by making all new structures contribute to the total housing in the system Personally, I don't see a house as an investment when it's made out of materials that degrade after 50 years. The land isn't worth that much and the cost of rebuilding or major repairs every 50 years means it's not an investment. Right now housing is being sold for insane hyperinflated prices, and they're not even made to last.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

always wondered why we dont use stone slabs anymore

how can rocks possible be more expensive now, than in ancient times?

[–] 1 pt

People don't build communities near the resources anymore. Now they build everywhere and anyway and moving things around is what's starting to cost money.

Trucks would rather move cheap particle board than heavy rocks or stone.

[–] 1 pt

People don't build communities near the resources anymore.

They kind of do though. Originally we built the communities at the resources, and these became cities, but the Jews forced us out of the cities.

So then they built the communities in the suburbs, and built them so close to the farms that, well, they are now right on top of the farms. Jews and their realtors/developers buried our most important resources under McMansions and Dieversity.

[–] 0 pt

It's not that rocks are more expensive, it's that other materials are cheaper.