The perfect synthesis of what Yuri Bezmenov and what CIA director William Casey . Thanks to the ZOG’s control of all information worldwide, it’s impossible for anyone to derive the genuine intent behind the action, so the action must be judged independently of its intent. It, alone, served only as the casus belli to disarm New Zealand, just as Port Arthur served as the casus belli to disarm Australia. It did not save New Zealand from nonwhite or Islamic invasion. That has expanded. It did not earn New Zealand freedom of speech (which they’ve never had); it only restricted speech further. It, alone, was a poor decision, but it’s only poor in retrospect–knowing now that no one will ever follow him up or fight back in any way, shape, or form–not in acting within a microcosm in and of itself.
Okay. That just sounds like you have qualms about it being a blip and a half measure. Akin to "If you kill your enemy, they win" retardation.
30 more and you'd be cooking with gas?
I have qualms about being proven right that no one will ever actually fight back. Ever. At any time. For any reason. Had the rest of New Zealand followed his example, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. We’d be talking about how New Zealand no longer exists because all the other nations of the world invaded, slaughtered all the whites down to the last unborn child, and made it an abbo homeland. Had the rest of white nations followed his example, we wouldn’t be having it either, because we’d be too busy laughing at nonwhites running from our machine gun fire.
But no one did anything. So ultimately the action was worthless.
(post is archived)