can confirm and its not just the us.
we have a supreme court that looked at a law created by an act of parliament that says 'you cant force people into medical treatments, you cant lock them in their homes, you cant limit their travel, you cant medically discriminate against anyone' then looked at a declaration made by one man saying 'youre all sick and im locking you in your homes and wearing masks but its nothing to do with china, and if you dont do it we are going to beat the living shit out of you' and decided the latter is somehow legal.
Literally not their job. At all.
If there was no human rights laws in our state, then it goes to the supreme courts to decide whether something EXTRAlegal can happen, like a grey area or something like that, that is when they get to say its legal. What the supreme court CANNOT do, is completely override a current act of law. It takes a parliamentary sitting to enact a law, and a parliamentary sitting to supercede or strike down a law.
The Supreme Court of Victorias absolute clear mandate as soon as this shit went to court was to say 'No, not only did you enact the Charter Act of 2006, even the state attorney general on your side of the fence (you fucking jackasses) says herself the act is still in effect. If the act is still in effect, and without a full session of parliament and a majority vote to abolish that law, then it must stand to reason that you cannot limit peoples movement, cannot force them to wear facemasks, cannot force them into testing or vaccination, and cannot fine them for any of these things, and you must stop it immediately.'
No more no less.
Supreme Court says its legal because Dan Andrews says so.
That makes the Supreme court also outlaws. Or at least that particular judge.
(post is archived)