Once again, it depends on the person. I've met plenty of old people that smoke like chimneys and still haven't had impaired lung function or any major health risks. I've also met a lot of young people with lung and heart issues, who don't smoke nearly as much. Life just picks winners based on how much they indulge the habit, and how much their hereditary background prevents them from getting sick. Really, though, in the hands of someone who can control themselves, vaping herbs or flower is much healthier and doesn't damage the lungs over time. Burning something is always harmful.
a lot of cunts have been very lucky
Yeah, and more have not. The thing about the lucky ones is that it does eventually run out.
Yes, just like people who choose to ride motorcycles or climb mountains. Do you want everyone to avoid doing anything that might shorten their life span? Sounds pretty damned authoritarian to me.
luck always runs out. that's life.
what about people who have asthma?
Obviously it would be better to not smoke at all. In every case.
Some people just don't want to save themselves or keep themselves healthy. It's nuts. Taking away the cigarettes is like taking candy away from a diabetic. You know that you're supposed to, but they're going to go and get more anyway, and the next time, they have something else you did to complain about. Just let them make their own choice and die on their own time. Personally, there's been a few smokers I've known that I'm very glad were taken out by the habit.
do you smoke cigarettes or weed?
Tobacco cured my asthma. It's a bronchial dilator just like Albuterol.
(post is archived)