Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

780

Amren dot com is Jared Taylor's websight, and an invaluable resource. This well spoken southern gentleman has consistently put out rational, thought provoking content without slander or impolite slurs. He is one of the most important thinkers of our time.

I read in another that two accounts have spammed amren. Ok, do something about them, but why ban the site?

This goes against the core of why I love Poal. I urge you to reconsider.

@Aou @PMYB2 Amren dot com is Jared Taylor's websight, and an invaluable resource. This well spoken southern gentleman has consistently put out rational, thought provoking content without slander or impolite slurs. He is one of the most important thinkers of our time. I read in another [post](https://poal.co/s/RealWhatever/290437/4108af94-a976-44ca-a34f-93f909652a88#cmnts) that two accounts have spammed amren. Ok, do something about them, but why ban the site? This goes against the core of why I love Poal. I urge you to reconsider.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (59).
[–] [Sticky] • 2 pts

It's not about who owns the domain. I know exactly who Jared Taylor is.

The problem is that website is filled with copypasta of articles from other places.

2 accounts were spamming it instead of posting the original links to the original articles.

Monetizing on articles you aren't the author is spam.

[–] • 4 pts

Is it possible to solve the problem with those two accounts, as opposed to denying this great resource to everyone? Also, I really don't understand the critique you offered. I just clicked on 3 of the first links on the website and theyseemed to be authored there; not copy pasta'd.

Look, bro, I know you have assholes yelling at you all the time that you aren't operating the site exactly as they would like. I'm not an OG, but I've been here coming on a year and a half. In all that time I've never been taken aback by any of your actions, never bitched about the way you handle the site, never joined the chorus of (goats mostly) people complaining that they can't downvote spam. I know we're not besties or anything, but to the extent that you recognize my name, I hope it rings true as someone who operates in good faith.

Like I said, I urge you to reconsider.

[–] • 1 pt

Check my other comment to MaTeachIT in this thread.

[–] • 0 pt

I wanted to let some time pass before replying.

I looked at the articles. They are not hiding that they reprinted the articles. Since when is reprinting articles spam? You'd have to get rid of a huge quantity of content if you believe that to be true. Will you ban Tim Pool next? 90% of what he does is rereading someone else's writing. They also provide the original link; they aren't hiding it. All the stories are in a particular vein, supporting the narrative that Amren wants to highlight.

Considering this spam strikes me as (with no disrespect intended) overly simplistic, black and white thinking. mentioned that it was temporary. How temporary?

I really hope you reconsider. Thank you for taking the time to address this concern.

[–] • 2 pts

Doesn’t he comment on the articles though? Giving his opinion and why he thinks they are significant? I’ve seen some good original thought from that website. Did not see the spamming of it you all speak about now. Curious lurker here

[–] • 1 pt

Did not see the spamming of it you all speak about now.

Remove the space and compare the with the original sources linked at the bottom of the copypasta.

  • https://www.amren .com/news/2021/02/the-humiliation-of-the-harriet-tubman-20/

  • https://www.amren .com/news/2021/02/two-15-year-old-schoolgirls-are-gang-raped-by-ten-men-on-a-park-bench/

  • https://www.amren. com/news/2021/02/north-carolina-to-stop-issuing-confederate-flag-license-plates/

  • https://www.amren. com/news/2021/02/mexico-has-stopped-accepting-some-central-american-families-expelled-by-u-s-along-the-border/

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

So, we're not savvy enough to determine the best sources for aggregating news, but you are?

Thank God we have you here to be our moral and intellectual hepafilter.

[–] • 0 pt

So, we're not savvy enough to determine the best sources for aggregating news, but you are?

Nice try.

The domain isn't banned for its content, but its behavior (copypasta entire articles from other sources and monetizing them).

If you can't understand that, you know what to do.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I find this decision seriously concerning. Archive.is does essentially the same thing: Copypasta articles from other sites then re-serve them with monetisation (a donate link). Why is what they do ok but what american rennaisance does isn't?

Dealing with spam is a valid concern, but banning the site rather than the accounts creates another hazard: It allows outside group to ban domains on poal just by spamming them with throwaway accounts.

[–] • 0 pt

I find this decision seriously concerning. Archive.is does essentially the same thing: Copypasta articles from other sites then re-serve them with monetisation (a donate link). Why is what they do ok but what american rennaisance does isn't?

Your comparison doesn't make sense.

Archive.is is clearly for archiving purpose.

They don't have publisher/author names linked to articles they did copy from other places. They don't mix them with ads.

[–] • 0 pt

Archive.is is clearly for archiving purpose.

What purpose do you claim AmRem is reposting those articles for?

They don't have publisher/author names linked to articles they did copy from other places.

I don't understand, would you prefer they didn't give credit?

They don't mix them with ads.

Ads. Donation links. Potato tomato. Either way money has to come from somewhere to cover the bandwidth.