Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

304

Amren dot com is Jared Taylor's websight, and an invaluable resource. This well spoken southern gentleman has consistently put out rational, thought provoking content without slander or impolite slurs. He is one of the most important thinkers of our time.

I read in another that two accounts have spammed amren. Ok, do something about them, but why ban the site?

This goes against the core of why I love Poal. I urge you to reconsider.

@Aou @PMYB2 Amren dot com is Jared Taylor's websight, and an invaluable resource. This well spoken southern gentleman has consistently put out rational, thought provoking content without slander or impolite slurs. He is one of the most important thinkers of our time. I read in another [post](https://poal.co/s/RealWhatever/290437/4108af94-a976-44ca-a34f-93f909652a88#cmnts) that two accounts have spammed amren. Ok, do something about them, but why ban the site? This goes against the core of why I love Poal. I urge you to reconsider.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (59).
[–] • 0 pt

I find this decision seriously concerning. Archive.is does essentially the same thing: Copypasta articles from other sites then re-serve them with monetisation (a donate link). Why is what they do ok but what american rennaisance does isn't?

Your comparison doesn't make sense.

Archive.is is clearly for archiving purpose.

They don't have publisher/author names linked to articles they did copy from other places. They don't mix them with ads.

[–] • 0 pt

Archive.is is clearly for archiving purpose.

What purpose do you claim AmRem is reposting those articles for?

They don't have publisher/author names linked to articles they did copy from other places.

I don't understand, would you prefer they didn't give credit?

They don't mix them with ads.

Ads. Donation links. Potato tomato. Either way money has to come from somewhere to cover the bandwidth.

[–] • 0 pt

I don't understand, would you prefer they didn't give credit?

I'm saying that the copied articles are signed by the staffer of amren.

Ads. Donation links. Potato tomato.

lol not at all. You are pulling at straws here.

A donation is not forced on you like ads are.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm saying that the copied articles are signed by the staffer of amren.

They link to the original article. I don't think anyone other than an idiot in a hurry would think they were claiming they wrote it.

Look, I get that you don't like their editorial policies, I'm fine with that. The issue is that you're taking this a step further and banning users from linking to them. That's taking things way too far.