Makes claims without providing source.
___
All images, videos or depictions of any kind that show sexually explicit or suggestive content involving children (whether virtual or real) is strictly prohibited. Additionally, any other depiction or form of media that shows sexually explicit content which is illegal in the United States (such as bestiality) is prohibited. Additionally, content or communications seeking to solicit, lure or entice minors into sexual activity or lewd behavior is also strictly prohibited. Any image depicting minors in a sexual way at all is prohibited.
The "sexually explicit or suggestive content" is the line in the sand. They know where the line is and use images to taunt people.
Posting images of babies as beautiful? Of course they are, and any old photos of children should be innocent, right? But is that the intent? I can't say what someone's intentions are, but after being on the internet I tend to expect the worst. By posting these kinds of photos does it encourage others to send PM's and ask for better ones? I don't know, I wish people could be trusted.
https://poal.co/s/WhiteBeauty/281979
Thanks for your comment.
and I will take a closer look at it.
Since you own the sub, you may want to get some Janitors
I fail to see anything sexual about those pics. But for some reason my recent Big Mike 0bama post was removed...what a crazy world.
I already acknowledge that they are not sexually explicit or suggestive. It is just known to be used as a coded method for pedos to identify each other to initiate private interaction. I am also not accusing these posters of doing that since I do not know their intentions. It does however feel weird and out of place. In our 2021 world posting photos of other peoples' children to admire how beautiful they are brings up red flags. We become hypervigilant out of necessity.
I've become cynical and distrusting of the internet.
Can't imagine why they are removing Big Mike posts, there have been many here.
can we be the 110 to ban jews?
(post is archived)