Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

739

When I brought this up to OP he went on a rant about how a lot of you think that these kids should be impregnated as soon as they hit puberty.

You realize you are sexualizing underage girls right? The hypocrisy and sickness of this place is unbelievable.

When I brought this up to OP he went on a rant about how a lot of you think that these kids should be impregnated as soon as they hit puberty. You realize you are sexualizing underage girls right? The hypocrisy and sickness of this place is unbelievable.

(post is archived)

[–] [Sticky] • 5 pts

Links please? I’ll be happy to deal with it if it’s possible I missed it I’m more than happy to handle it. If you’ve seen this behavior and not reported it then that is something you should be doing.

[–] • 1 pt

Why?

I get what you're trying to do but this is a very odd thing. Can teen girls not be beautiful?

Or are you referring to;

When I brought this up to OP he went on a rant about how a lot of you think that these kids should be impregnated as soon as they hit puberty.

[–] • 2 pts

Admins need to see who upvoted this pedo and nuke them both.

[–] • 1 pt

Do (((you))) know what pedo means? It doesn't mean finding teenagers as attractive.

But this is why (((you're))) filtered. Not sure why I'm replying.

[–] • 0 pt

Luckily I haven't seen a lot of it but I will send them to you as I see them. As far as I'm concerned one is too many.

[–] [Sticky] • 3 pts

Makes claims without providing source.

___

All images, videos or depictions of any kind that show sexually explicit or suggestive content involving children (whether virtual or real) is strictly prohibited. Additionally, any other depiction or form of media that shows sexually explicit content which is illegal in the United States (such as bestiality) is prohibited. Additionally, content or communications seeking to solicit, lure or entice minors into sexual activity or lewd behavior is also strictly prohibited. Any image depicting minors in a sexual way at all is prohibited.

https://poal.co/tos

[–] • 2 pts

The "sexually explicit or suggestive content" is the line in the sand. They know where the line is and use images to taunt people.

Posting images of babies as beautiful? Of course they are, and any old photos of children should be innocent, right? But is that the intent? I can't say what someone's intentions are, but after being on the internet I tend to expect the worst. By posting these kinds of photos does it encourage others to send PM's and ask for better ones? I don't know, I wish people could be trusted.

https://poal.co/s/WhiteBeauty/281979

https://poal.co/s/WhiteBeauty/281981

https://poal.co/s/WhiteBeauty/281973

[–] • 2 pts

Thanks for your comment.

and I will take a closer look at it.

[–] • 0 pt

Since you own the sub, you may want to get some Janitors

[–] • 0 pt

I fail to see anything sexual about those pics. But for some reason my recent Big Mike 0bama post was removed...what a crazy world.

[–] • 0 pt

I already acknowledge that they are not sexually explicit or suggestive. It is just known to be used as a coded method for pedos to identify each other to initiate private interaction. I am also not accusing these posters of doing that since I do not know their intentions. It does however feel weird and out of place. In our 2021 world posting photos of other peoples' children to admire how beautiful they are brings up red flags. We become hypervigilant out of necessity.

I've become cynical and distrusting of the internet.

Can't imagine why they are removing Big Mike posts, there have been many here.

[–] • 1 pt

can we be the 110 to ban jews?

[–] • 4 pts

Hahahahaha.

Pedophile reveals himself.

Hey, pervert, not everyone thinks "sex" when they see pictures of kids. Looks like you do, though.

Maybe some people like the sight of kids being raised well and appreciate the potential they hold and what they can do in the future and can appreciate a picture without thinking about fucking them.

Did that ever occur to you, you sick fuck?

[–] • 0 pt

Read through some of the comments on those posts moron. The OP told me these girls should be "bred with" when they hit puberty. So tell me I'm wrong dip shit.

[–] • 3 pts

https://poal.co/s/WhiteBeauty/287229/7a6bad79-11c4-4e77-8505-cd8355a282f3

That's one post (((OP))) is talking about. Both girls are at least mid-teens. So while underage, in no way are they "young girls" as (((he))) presents.

So I went back to page 18 of his comments. Which is as far back as 10d ago. Searching for "White" on each page and the only relevant post is the one above.

This feels like kike posting to mess with the site.

[–] • 1 pt

mid-teens. So while underage, in no way are they "young girls"

You don’t think mid-teens are young girls? I must be getting old.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

No. When I think "young girls" I think YOUNG GIRLS, those of adolescent age. Adolescence...

Fuck me so fucking hard. (((they've))) changed the definition of adolescence. It's now 10-24, it used to be 3-8.

I go with;

  • adolescence = 3-8
  • tween = 9-12
  • teen = 13 - 18
  • young adult = 19 - I don't even know or care, 22-26 or so.
[–] • 0 pt

It's now 10-24, it used to be 3-8.

That’s what

[–] • 0 pt

Far as I recall, adolescence has meant the same time period as approx late middle/high school. A 3yo is just beyond toddler, not an adolescent.

Anyway, OP you are bitching about literally says “young teenage girls”, so not sure if this conversation is going anywhere relevant.

[+] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 1 pt

They used to be married and having babies young, now they just get gang nigged after school.

[–] • 1 pt

Jews are everywhere.

[–] • 1 pt

If this happens on , dm me immediately please. I would like to know about this right away.

I am on chat.Poal.co (Riot/Element Chat) as well, that's probably the best way to reach me.

They'll get a ban from this sub and I will forward that to Boobs and AOU. They can decide what happens with the user.

[–] • 0 pt

I've seen them all in white Beauty and I'm pretty sure it's the owner of that sub who does it

[–] • 1 pt

Dont you know who this motherfucker is? And all his past names and posts at voat?

[–] • 0 pt

I know who you are too and you're still obsessed with me just like you were on Voat. I own your mind. Ha ha ha

[–] • 0 pt

I miss Voat, but I love Poal for the fact the site owners take a strong and active stance against the faggots that troll the line with this shit. The loli shit and the constant graphic description of child abuse, the fact it went unchecked for so long on Voat made me turn away, it was disheartening. Free speech is great, but there was no way to check some faggot going too far like you would physically.

[–] • 1 pt

I fought against that garbage on voat more than anyone else. It's disgusting to see posts here in the same vein. Maybe they're not as bad but they are just pushing the limit with what they can get away with, it's still sick. To see so many upvotes on these posts reaffirms my beliefs that most everyone here is a scumbag.

[–] • 0 pt

I also did whatever I thought I could to ward them off. I haven't noticed it here really, but I will begin keeping a closer eye out. That shit has gotta stop.