>When you can't beat something, you push it so hard it breaks.
Sounds horribly like alinsky's rule 11 if you ask me... "Horribly" in the sense that... You got it backward it seems
Like you got your ass handed to you by mike tyson, and now your strategy is to try harder, head on...
I'm sure it's going to work this time /s
What you're planing to do here, if I understand correctly, correct me if I'm wrong, is that you plan to crank racism to 11, correct?
In the hope that it will turn into? ... Into what?
You're only going to prove dems right eventually, that's all, you're only going to reinforce their narrative
If anything what they want is to have at least some traces, somewhere, of real "nazis"/racism, I mean it's so rare... So they can say "look, they really do exist look!"
They were so desperate to label trump supporters as nazis. Too bad they were just civnats, look at proudboys and their brown leader
Edit: sorry, my bad. I've re-read your post and it seems your intent is to shame them into submission by exposing anti white racism
Alright, more power to you
...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_Radicals#The_Rules
>"Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have."
>"Never go outside the expertise of your people."
>"Whenever possible go outside the expertise of the enemy."
>"Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
>"Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. There is no defense. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."
>"A good tactic is one your people enjoy."
>"A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag."
>"Keep the pressure on."
>"The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. "
>"The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition."
>"If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside; this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative."
>"The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative."
>"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. "
...
Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals #11: “If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside”
To explain his eleventh rule, Saul Alinksy tells a story about his time as a grassroots organizer. When he was organizing activists against a corporation, the corporation hired people to break into his home and his organizations’ office and steal the documents and records Alinksy and his allies had put together about the corporation.
Losing all of those documents could have been a huge setback to Alinsky’s cause. The stolen records likely represented countless hours of work. Even worse, now his opposition had his entire strategy.
Instead, Alinsky found a way to turn the negative into a positive. “When a corporation bungles like the one that burglarized my home and office, my visible public reaction is shock, horror, and moral outrage.” Spreading the word about the break-in made Alinsky and his allies the victims and helped paint their opponents in a bad light.
...
That's what he actually meant, it's a victimization tactic essentially
Sounds horribly like alinsky's rule 11 if you ask me... "Horribly" in the sense that... You got it backward it seems
Actually thats exactly what I had in mind. Learn from our enemies. They use it because it works.
Like you got your ass handed to you by mike tyson, and now your strategy is to try harder, head on...
Actually no, what we've been doing is being polite and trying to avoid racism as a society.
You're only going to prove dems right eventually,
"Muh optics".
If a wife beater beats his wife because "she was gonna leave me!", and she finally does, that just proves the wife beater was right!
Thats letting them dictate the rules. Never allow our enemies to dictate the rules.
If anything what they want is to have at least some traces, somewhere, of real "nazis"/racism, I mean it's so rare... So they can say "look, they really do exist look!"
Racism is their boogieman weapon. The moment you confront or control it, they are entirely disarmed.
Achilles -> Heel.
Where will the left go once there are actual racists out there? Where will they go when a mirror is held up to them? What power will they have left when they no longer have the great lie, and are forced, in their fumbling to now tell the truth? Look at how they recoil, are at a loss for words, when confronted by someone like Martinez, or Patrick Little. The only thing they've been trained to do is attack people who are rhetorically or philosophically fleeing from them. The only thing they know how to do is to fight against a people setup to act as paper tigers.
Darkness flees in the light of hard truth.
I've edited my post 2hours ago, you've posted yours 1 hour ago... Not sure why you're quoting the part I clearly redacted. Redacted as in striked in red
Are you using links browser or something?
>Racism is their boogieman weapon. The moment you confront or control it, they are entirely disarmed.
Yes and you don't control TV, they do, you don't control mainstream social media, they do, and the more racist you act the more proven right they are, it's just logical, there's no debate to have on that terrain, racism is immoral (racism as in hatred toward anyone on the sole basis of his/her real or supposed ethnic background), whether you like it or not is irrelevant
Just answering regardless for anyone who read it.
"Oh no, they will be proven right!" If they are going to use accusations of racism to destroy or replace you regardless then there's no point in refuting it.
if racism is immoral maybe they should stop engaging in it and promoting it against us.
And the only way you break the psychological stranglehold of the accusation is by confronting it directly.
(post is archived)