Rule#1
If it is allowed on TV, Movie screens, Radio, Magazines, Newspapers, Twitter, Facebook, etc...
It is part of the problem.
If it appears to be fighting the problem, it is controlled opposition.
All other rules, refer to rule #1.
Do you have any idea how much time ive spent explaining that if tucker carlson were truly on our side he wouldnt be allowed on fox. But they never listen. The sheep are so far gone. They wont wake up until they get hungry, and by then its much too late.
The #1 reason why I keep mistrusting Carlson (even when its tempting to like and trust the guy) is because he has made it quite clear he has no intention to leave FOX.
Fox has wanted to get rid of him, but they are scared that unlike Glen Beck and Bill (whatever his last name is), that Tucker wouldn't be a flop.
Especially with News Max having grown he could always move and Fox would have a real competitor.
He really aught to convince them to give him a big signing bonus in the form of part ownership to move. A $250k signing bonus wouldn't be too big if that's what they got out of it, and Tucker would end up multiplying that almost instantly. Use staged vestment to make it so he can get some money out of that relatively soon, but also so a good chunk of it is at the 6 year mark. I think that would work out really well for everyone.
Idk if i believe that they want to get rid of him.
This is so Sad but true
(post is archived)