WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

258

Why? In the absence of Q no one would have done anything anyway: a great bulk of Q people fucking WATCHED TV NEWS. Seems redundant and pointless to game them toward their already indicated inertia

Why? In the absence of Q no one would have done anything anyway: a great bulk of Q people fucking WATCHED TV NEWS. Seems redundant and pointless to game them toward their already indicated inertia

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I believe weaponized psychology is the most dangerous thing to everyone of the planet. That said, I see it everywhere. From advertisements to political scumbags. Both pretend to not notice or talk about what they say vs what they do. Both legal. Both unethical and have adverse results on the greatest number of people for their gain.

Knowing what little I know about psychology with how much I see it being used for gain, I can not put the idea Q was a so called psyop away.

Perhaps the psychology behind it was something like knowing the largest percent of people that might start a civil war would believe Q. If they were not trusting the plan they might have been making plans. This would be an interesting thing if true. It would imply they can not monitor everyone. They can collect all the data and store it but no real time picking out the people of interest.

Then again, it is easy to put things together when you use imagination to fill the missing bits.