I used to believe this too, but the economics of ideology do not allow for this to ever be true.
The 1st amendment and the american experiment ONLY worked because the country was genetically uniform ... america was white with a smallish black population effectively segregated even after slavery ended. You can only have freedom of thought in genetically uniform societies because genetic uniformity is kinship and kinship mechanisms are control mechanisms that keep things mostly in check.
At the end of the 60s the Jews (who have been working on this since the first one immigrated over a 100 years ago) managed to pry open the immigration gates and take control of our medium and therefore our children and our culture. You cannot have free speech in a multicultural society. This is because every genetic group will always be striving to wipe the other genetic groups out of existence, which is happening to us now in the west.
So, how do you inegrate the need for freedom of thought and the above?
The only way that I have found is to realize the belief systems are not an ideal to strive for. Belief systems are merely a tool to help genetic groups survive. In other words, it doesn't matter what the beleif system is, all that matters is does the beleif system help us survive.
In other words, liberalism and communism are belief systems used to FIRST palacate the host genetic group and SECOND prepare the host genetic population for extinction.
You are right only if you ignore that the ONLY thing that matters is the survival of our white race.
There is no way around this. Once you see this, you understand what the democrats, republicans and all of the traitors have been doing for the last 60 years to us.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment.
I think your idea about uniformity providing a canvas for freedom of speech is worth thought. It's obvious that people tend to uniformly group themselves by nature. It's also obvious that these groups form ideas that they only share between themselves. It would be very easy for an outsider to misunderstand an "inside idea". of course you could point to sites like this but there are more less obvious examples in our every day lives.
Just because something was easier in the past doesn't mean that it's impossible today. It isn't controversial for people on this site to recognize and respect boundaries, but it is difficult for people on that other site. If we want freedom of speech we need to create boundaries and respect them. We means everyone who participates in our society.
There is nothing wrong with wanting to preserve your kind. You aren't crazy, there is a trend towards multi-culturalism which is needlessly alienating a significant number of people, myself included.
I had a coal burning cousin who paid the toll, i kept my mouth shut, but grandma didn't. Perhaps that's the liberalism creeping into our lives little by little. Perhaps we should be a bit more outspoken. There is no reason why my white babies should be more controversial than her black babies. It shouldn't be controversial to point out that my children are more likely to be successful than hers because I made smart personal sacrifices which include picking a more fit partner.
Here we are, thank you for your thoughts!
Awesome! Post more, thank you for your feedback.
(post is archived)