See, that what I’m talking about. I don’t have any power in this situation. I gave the admin the benefit of every doubt. He can’t handle challengers. Truth is, ARM didn’t violate any terms of service. He was just being annoying. That’s why he got banned. That’s my point. “Being annoying” doesn’t violate any site rules. The admin is just pulling this out of his ass. It’s their site. They can do what they want. But I call it how I see it.
Truth is, ARM didn’t violate any terms of service.
He did. You denying it won't make it go away.
Using Poal as a place to discuss, plan or engage in any action that would* compromise security, tamper with system resources or accounts on computers at Poal, or any other site, is strictly prohibited.
He abused the mentions (towards admins) and doubled down when warned.
Now keep crying, it sure won't make him back.
It’s obvious to everyone involved that you got tired of people bitching about lists. It didn’t take a genius to see that. ARM bore the brunt of your wrath.
You claiming it’s “tampering with system resources” is spurious. That means something else: was he logging in a bunch of different accounts, specifically to annoy you? That would constitute “tampering”, because it actually violates terms of service.
I get it; your house, your rules. But what you’ve done afterwards has been ridiculous. It paints the picture you’re a thin-skinned tyrant. Is that true? I don’t know. But it just looks like you’ve completely lost your cool. It didn’t escape my notice it’s aimed at other people who bitched about lists.
I believe you that he was pinging you in comments a whole bunch. That’s not what’s in question. It what you’ve proceeded to do about it ever since, which is questionable.
I think that...[opinion based on suppositions]
Thanks for your concern.
You're not wrong but I will say I got ping spammed by tranny stalkers on Voat alot and it was beyond just being obnoxious.
(post is archived)