yes, and we can test those assumptions ... and have. we just can't find those sneaky gravitons.
why do heavier things displace lighter things?
yes, and we can test those assumptions ... and have. we just can't find those sneaky gravitons.
>why do heavier things displace lighter things?
Occam’s razor: cause they don’t exist! Gravity is a theory they needed to invent to make the fake ball conditioning work.
Occam’s razor: cause they don’t exist! Gravity is a theory they needed to invent to make the fake ball conditioning work.
So name the phenomenon that makes heavier things displace lighter things.
And then tell my why that happens.
You sure like to avoid direct questions, much like liars and likes.
So name the phenomenon that makes heavier things displace lighter things.
And then tell my why that happens.
You sure like to avoid direct questions, much like liars and likes.
Density, buoyancy, the indisputable properties of mass and matter... I thought your question was rhetorical. Gravity IS a theory. Or have you proved it?
Density, buoyancy, the indisputable properties of mass and matter... I thought your question was rhetorical. Gravity IS a theory. Or have you proved it?
(post is archived)