WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

672

1) Include a commonly used feature on social media sites. 2) Punish users who use that feature. 3) ?? 4) Profit?

Copied from the searchvoat forum about Voat alternatives:

"POAL was pretty bad, they didn't understand the common useage of the downvote button. I asked their Admin about that policy, and they told me that I could thumb-down posts and I would be ok as long as I wasn't predatory and went after specific users. The next think I know, I went from a positive 60 rating, to negative 100+. They claim "Say what you want" then censor you into oblivion! I don't need them! They can run their little comfort blanket circle jerk echo chamber without me!"

1) Include a commonly used feature on social media sites. 2) Punish users who use that feature. 3) ?? 4) Profit? Copied from the searchvoat forum about Voat alternatives: "POAL was pretty bad, they didn't understand the common useage of the downvote button. I asked their Admin about that policy, and they told me that I could thumb-down posts and I would be ok as long as I wasn't predatory and went after specific users. The next think I know, I went from a positive 60 rating, to negative 100+. They claim "Say what you want" then censor you into oblivion! I don't need them! They can run their little comfort blanket circle jerk echo chamber without me!"

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I know. It's not allowed anywhere. It was not allowed on voat.

But loli hentai is drawing and therefore it is allowed.

That does not change my point. The user was a pedo, he even had comments like: "no such thing was too young". Replying to a comment on a picture of a clearly underage girl in bikini.

He was not posting CP. But pedo related (loli drawing) and comments. And me and others were happily downvoating his posts and comments, even the normal ones.

[–] 1 pt

But loli hentai is drawing and therefore it is allowed

I don't think that's allowed here either.

comments like: "no such thing was too young".

also not allowed here

You would not need to downvote this kind of person here because they will be banned.

[–] 0 pt

I get it. It was an example. Some people deserve the downvote. That is my point. It should not be: only if the content is in the wrong place (aside from rule breaking). Check the "funny" section and you will see.

[–] 1 pt

I'm not seeing many good examples where downvotes are needed that isn't spam or against site rules. We are about letting people speak.