You also "know" that one thing existing longer than another undoubtedly makes it better than the latter, which again makes Eddit better than Poal in your book, but wee already gotten past how little you truly know.
Everyone here took what I said the way I meant it. You are the only dipshit here that took it in a way I did not intend. You are the one with the problem. You have a problem with what I said because you took it in a way no one else did and I did not intend.
Now fuck off
Okay, then here's your chance:
Guys, voat.co is gone and poal is not voat. It's better if for no other reason it is still here.
Explain this line in the way that's so obvious to everyone. Explain what I missed, and what it's supposed to say. Because, to me, this says that Thing1 is better than Thing2 because it still exists, and "for no other reason."
I'm simply calling you out on this. I'm talking to you using your logic.
The Biden administration must be better to you for no other reason that it'll exist beyond the Trump administration. The Prius must be a better car than the Chevelle, for no other reason that it still exists and the Chevelle is no longer made. And Eddit must be better than Poal, just like Poal is "better" than Voat, because it's existed longer. Is this not what those quoted lines are stating?
My claim is a simple one, and you're making my point for me. The Chevelle is a VASTLY superior car, even though it no longer exists and the Prius does. Trump is a VASTLY superior leader, especially when compared to Biden, even after the Trump administration no longer exists. And your logic of Poal being better than Voat due to one existing beyond the other is similarly wrong.
Guy, I already explained it as clear as I can. Go back and read. I'm not going to spoon feed you after all the equine scatology.
(post is archived)