So you admit, 6 % died directly from covid. And 94% may have died from covid.
Now, we have that straight.
So if the data is that ambiguous and isn't out publicly in the main stream news, why do you think that is?
And again, covid is covid, no matter where you are in the world. CDC one of a handful of leading infectious disease institutions in the world and many people use it. So when you make an excuse that there's more deaths there than here is weak.
So you admit, 6 % died directly from covid. And 94% may have died from covid.
Well that's not even right is it, 6% of people who tested for covid and died from causes consistent with covid had no other medical conditions. The rest had some medical condition, even long term conditions like diabetes or hypertension, and died from causes consistent with covid.
There may be some in the latter category who would have died anyway, however if you look at the excess death statistics...
So if the data is that ambiguous and isn't out publicly in the main stream news, why do you think that is?
First of all the "MSM" do talk about it. .
Secondly given that those excess death statistics, which are not subject to any ambiguity, correlate extremely well to the CDC coronavirus death statistics... we can reasonably conclude that the CDC statistics are an accurate portrayal of covid related deaths.
Unless you have a better theory for why hundreds of thousands more people have died this year?
Now I know you are a shill.
BBC as a source???
Did you forget what you were talking about? You complained the MSM don't talk about how covid statistics can be inaccurate, I showed the BBC (peak MSM) talking about how covid statistics can be inaccurate.
Maybe you should get your nursesisters to check your head over, memory problems can be the early signs of more serious conditions.
(post is archived)