WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

WSJ mentioned this in the opinion pages today...

Sure, I love seeing the hypocrisy on display re: not addressing Slick Willy.

But I'd rather not use the "believe women" shit just to further our gains

WSJ mentioned this in the opinion pages today... Sure, I love seeing the hypocrisy on display re: not addressing Slick Willy. But I'd rather not use the "believe women" shit just to further our gains

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

yes! Common sense and self responsibility would bring us back to a place where we would believe women when they said they were raped, or at least take it serious.

That and a society that actually sees sex as something sacred and not a free for all.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

I am starting to think that only farm types actually viewed it that way as they had real life examples of the hardships of birth and sustaining life. Words and ideas are mostly empty without real life context. From a male perspective sex isn't and never will be "sacred" as we are programmed to want to spread the seed as far and wide as possible. Celibacy and sex being sacred is mostly beneficial to women, men should be taught the reasons for treating women with respect and the value it brings.

[–] 2 pts

I don't think men can never see sex as sacred but I do understand how that is going against their nature. You would think with all the consciousnesses for women more would think of it as sacred and not put themselves in situations where bad things are more likely to happen.

Our jewish run media sexualises women to an insane degree from well before puberty. That and the feminist movement and women being given almost zero consequences comparatively all couple to make degenerate whores. How women can kill life inside them and then continue with degeneracy is beyond me, if you have any insights on that one i am all ears.