WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

952

I think at some point, Porn will be banned via a Constitutional Amendment. It'll happen probably some point in the next few decades.

On top of that, I think it will be a repeat of the Alcohol Prohibition of the 20th Century. That one didn't work and it made things worse. I bet doing a Porn Prohibition will cause the same to happen.

I think at some point, Porn will be banned via a Constitutional Amendment. It'll happen probably some point in the next few decades. On top of that, I think it will be a repeat of the Alcohol Prohibition of the 20th Century. That one didn't work and it made things worse. I bet doing a Porn Prohibition will cause the same to happen.

(post is archived)

[–] 8 pts

The entire porn industry in the West is Jew-owned, just like Pedollywood and the music industry.

Kikes use porn to push degeneracy, such as

  • Interracial, mainly black males and shapeshifting Jewish women, who pretend to be white.

  • Incest

  • Pedophilia

  • and other fucked up fetishes.

Meanwhile porn is banned in Israel (or you need to register with your ID card so your ISP can whitelist your connection).

[–] 3 pts

I had someone mention that there will be a push at some point to normalize incest. It's only matter of when. I think a while back there was enough of a push back to where it didn't work

Music Industry, I will say that more and more musicians are going independent. I think Kanye West is looking to get his and all the masters for everyone in his genre ownership of them

[–] 3 pts

cuties on netflix. your case and point.

hollywood has been able to show nude children in movies for decades, and argue in court that its "Art" and not "whatever you gentiles think this is". I wonder if i will see the day when hollywood burns to the ground like sodam and gramora.

[–] 2 pts

All that has to happen is people need to start their own film companies and streaming services. While better said than done, if consumers are unwilling to give Hollywood their dollars, they will eventually run dry and out of business.

[–] -1 pt

Don't bet on a meteor shower doing it for you.

[–] [deleted] 5 pts

The science is fairly sound: Anything that gives you a dopamine hit can be weaponized as an addiction.

Once you fuck up your dopamine response from repeated stimulus, you have to go harder and harder to find something to give that extra frisson of stimulation to get you over the edge.

It starts with admiring the majesty of boobs, but you'll be cranking it to midget clown porn before you know it :(

[–] 2 pts

I doubt it and I wouldn't support it, even though it would benefit the country. It is anti-freedom and I value freedom.

[–] 2 pts

I consider pornography human trafficking, like prostitution. What other crime becomes legal when you film it and distribute copies of the crime being committed?

Porn is a psyop. It's "helps" you become tolerant to degenerates and feminism, and lowers testosterone production. It lowers birthrates and encourages sluttery. Freedom to exploit is not freedom for all, and the many horror stories from the industry make it clear they're looking for degraded sex slaves, not sex actresses.

[–] 0 pt

It is not human trafficking if the people doing it are of their own free will. Would you call the girls on 'OnlyFans' trafficked?

Do we wish to maintain an individual's freedom or enter a national socialist system? Each system has its own advantages.

People get exploited due to their own stupidity all the time. If it isn't porn than it could be something else. You may as well make certain used car sales illegal.

You make very good points. It is an interesting argument.

[–] 1 pt

Yes, I would call onlyfans girls trafficked, like prostitutes with a hands-off pimp they've never met. If we legalized prostitution, porn should be legal as well. If we continue to outlaw prostitution, porn should be a subcategory.

Right now the age restriction on porn watching is never enforced. This is brazenly malicious against children growing up today. Porn is a weapon of genocide; if it renders people incapable of defending other freedoms through demoralization, what good is the freedom to view it?

The mainstream idea of human freedom doesn't make sense to people using persuasion technology. Free will only applies to people who can use this communications tech: it allows them to persuade themselves into actions they decide for themselves, and gives them some resistance against others using these methods against them.

Half of these self-help books are just self-talk books. The rest is evolutionary strategies for products and services.

[–] 2 pts

If I have learned anything in my life its that you can't legislate away human behavior. It just doesn't work. You have to win hearts and minds to your ideals making a law just creates a black market if the demand is still there.

[–] 2 pts

Oh I agree. That's why I say it would be a dumpster fire if they did it

[–] 3 pts

From what I can tell, government seems to be very good at creating dumpster fires.