WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

345

EDIT: EFF page explaining the "EARN IT" act's affects on free speech and internet privacy: -

EDIT2: SIgn the EFF Petition to fight against the "EARN IT" Act: https://act.eff.org/action/protect-our-speech-and-security-online-reject-the-graham-blumenthal-bill (Thanks )


Been wondering why there's been so much internet censorship lately? Gotta keep this on the hush-hush.

The Eliminating Abusive and Rampant Neglect of Interactive Technologies Act (EARN IT Act) would force technology companies to kill encryption programs that prevent hackers, law enforcement officers and many others from accessing private online communication systems.

- source; https://archive.vn/SaTNs --

Need reason to be sketched out?

They're running the typical "Think of the Children" gambit

In a press release from March 5th, the senators claim the bill is meant to "encourage the tech industry to take online child sexual exploitation seriously."

- source: https://archive.vn/wip/Y0yxe --

"

### EDIT: EFF page explaining the "EARN IT" act's affects on free speech and internet privacy: [link](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/03/earn-it-act-violates-constitution) - [archive](https://archive.vn/3mTvN) ### EDIT2: SIgn the EFF Petition to fight against the "EARN IT" Act: https://act.eff.org/action/protect-our-speech-and-security-online-reject-the-graham-blumenthal-bill (Thanks @NiceIce) --------------------------------------- Been wondering why there's been so much internet censorship lately? Gotta keep this on the hush-hush. > The Eliminating Abusive and Rampant Neglect of Interactive Technologies Act (EARN IT Act) would force technology companies to kill encryption programs that prevent hackers, law enforcement officers and many others from accessing private online communication systems. > \- source; https://archive.vn/SaTNs -- [webshot](https://pic8.co/i/143780a6-f4c8-4794-a413-4cc332c6fa6e/) ### Need reason to be sketched out? They're running the typical "Think of the Children" gambit > In a press release from March 5th, the senators claim the bill is meant to "encourage the tech industry to take online child sexual exploitation seriously." > \- source: https://archive.vn/wip/Y0yxe -- [webshot](https://pic8.co/i/19b4de99-23b2-443f-b081-8cec2a193cd6/) ### "[CONGRESS] CANNOT DIRECT HOW AND WHETHER ONLINE PLATFORMS HOST USER-GENERATED CONTENT." And this is a PROBLEM. They need to shut us down. If the government/corporations cannot monitor and control what we say, they cannot control us. and this IS a problem for them. # Spread the word. People need to know about this campaign. They win by keeping us in the dark. # This is NOT a partisan issue! Both democrats AND republicans are pushing for this bill. Do not pretend there's some "red vs blue" situation here. It's an us (the citizenry) vs them (government/corps) siutation. ### Lindsey Graham and Dianne Feinstein working together? Looks like they've found some common ground. -------------------------------- # Meaningful Commentary by Poaler's ["EARN IT" act to do to Tor what Germany did to JonDonym - @britac](https://poal.co/s/TellPoal/184568/4afddffc-8c43-4ea6-8a22-e55ee57b4413#cmnts) ["EARN IT" act to ruin online banking? - @citizenaspirant](https://poal.co/s/TellPoal/184568/54e46edf-109a-45a9-a45e-3cb51b1afe2d#cmnts)

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Once upon a time, more than ten years ago I read stuff like when going to bed.

[–] 0 pt

I bet the NSA's perks suck.

[–] 0 pt

Its the old equation of having less quality of life vs. having no privacy and being a lemming, I think.

[–] 0 pt

Philosophically, maybe this would be worth discussing further.

In both situations, one can be (and probably is, often) a lemming. Human's are relatively terrible at making good long-term survival decisions - otherwise most of us wouldn't ever consider overly-processed foods and other such vices, even if they were a last resort.

I can see immediate pro/con's of either. Human's are tribal, and solve almost all conflict through varying escalating attempts at compromise, ultimately culminating in violence as the final decision maker; ergo, systems of control culminate in a monopoly on violence. We are, usually, products of our environment and experiences - with a dash of chaos ("luck", "chance", or whatever) mixed in as we traverse this timeline.

The No-Such-Agency man is probably akin to a linear JRPG of (mostly) artificial rules and barriers ("the system", management), with target accomplishments you can level-up to attain better stats which dictate the difficulty you navigate life. Be a good goy, follow the rules, show you obey the plan; get ever-increasing promotion, expanded responsibility, and compensation.

Conversely, the modern neo-serf proletariat class, as a whole the 99.99%, play a game where they try to live the best life they can, using the grand chess-board of the modern technologically connected world, while doing everything to avoid being noticed by the systems of control whenever possible.

In the end, both suffer under the (current, at least as far as I understand reality) inevitability of death, making their choices of association and conformity all but irrelevant unless they are of some prominent note - and even then, under varying, ever-swinging pendulum of social and moral tribal decision making, governed by whatever systems of control and aggregate worship of the time.

In short, time is the only currency you really have in life, and how you use it is what defines you in history.