I agree with you. As much as you can laugh at these retards, mentally ill men killing themselves is ultimately a tragedy.
Do you think going the opposite way would work? As in, you post manly cross dressers, and then start making comments like, oops, forgot to take my estrogen pills today, but that doesn't make me any less of a woman, does it?
You then start a flame war within the subreddit as some will say that because you're not putting ENOUGH effort, you shouldn't get their support, but then you counter that with the opposite argument about being supportive and inclusive of all people.
It's a fine balance, but if you get it right, it should be hilarious and encourage introspection on behalf of the mentally ill faggots too.
Hmm, interesting thought. The problem I see is it would just be an exercise in reinforcing the narrative for them. It's asking for agreement on a manly dude being called a woman, which they will gladly agree with and it won't cause any infighting. It's still lying to them and spreading disinformation that happens to be the disinformation that their thought leaders want them to have any way.
We think because we are psyopping them into accepting disinformation we are somehow helping or doing something novel / difficult and therefore valuable. Instead we should look at what disinformation there is already and attack that.
Somehow people get this idea that strategy has to be complicated therefor the more complicated and difficult it is to see it's value the better the strategy it is. It's simple. Look at what your enemy wants to accomplish, and do the opposite.
(post is archived)