Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

703

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Degeneracy can't survive in a free speech environment.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

It can if jews convince us that free speech is child pornography

[–] • 1 pt

Consider what happened on Voat before it got locked down. There were old subs for porn there but they were all dead, because the people who posted on them got shamed by the rest of the community until they just stopped trying. Consider this as a microcosm of what a truly free society would look like - no one would want to associate with faggots and pornographers and no one would be compelled to, so all the degenerates would starve to death because anyone productive enough to have food to sell would refuse to do business with them.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I don't know if that applies to pedophiles.

Regular degenerates maybe, but look at how kikes get them to group up and wave their cocks in parades under "protected speech". Maybe we can have free speech again once day but there must be a massive purge and reestablishing of morality. I talked to pedo buddha just yesterday and he insists his pedophilia is "free speech".

[–] • 1 pt

So would you like to limit Freedom of Speech?

[–] • 1 pt

Exactly. Turn the clock back some decades. Porn was mostly illegal; free speech was legal.

Sites like this would be healthier without porn or gore of any kind. There is plenty of porn and gore elsewhere on the net.

[–] • 3 pts

No can do on the banning porn thing, that would involve banning certain art and other things. Its a line I explored when I first decided to start the site and where I ended up on the issue is where I am. I'm open to being convinced otherwise but I've spent a lot of time on these types of issues.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Adult porn is what it is. People are going to want to look at naked ladies, and standard fare isn't much worse than let's say obesity or excessive drinking. Sexualizing children or trying to dox naked pictures of people who didn't want those public is another matter.

[–] • 1 pt

Agreed and both of those two things mentioned in the last sentence are already against the ToS