Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

602

We can't hate The Commerce Clause enough!

Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States (1964) was a landmark Supreme Court case affirming Congress's power under the Commerce Clause to ban racial discrimination in private businesses, specifically public accommodations like hotels, solidifying Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited refusing service based on race, finding such discrimination substantially affected interstate commerce, thus allowing federal intervention despite claims of infringing property/liberty rights.

We can't hate The Commerce Clause enough! >Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States (1964) was a landmark Supreme Court case affirming Congress's power under the Commerce Clause to ban racial discrimination in private businesses, specifically public accommodations like hotels, solidifying Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited refusing service based on race, finding such discrimination substantially affected interstate commerce, thus allowing federal intervention despite claims of infringing property/liberty rights.
[–] • 1 pt

It SHOULD affect interstate commerce. States that do things desirable to White people should get more White business and residents, and have niggers leaving. So basically this reduced the ability of states to differentiate themselves.

[–] • 1 pt

basically this reduced the ability of states to differentiate themselves.

Federal overreach has created this in many areas. They do it on purpose. If we had state rights as intended many of our issues would go away as people voted with their feet.