I don't disagree entirely, but where did i say the definition hadn't been changed to include mRNA ??. Many of us know that to be the case and have been saying that very thing. Nor is my info out of date it actually concurs that m-RNA 'vaccines are a Gene therapy marketed to the public as a vaccine. As how Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell Gene therapy's were already marketed to the public as a 'Cancer vaccine'. So really the argument is kinda moot now as that RNA Gene therapies are being marketed as a 'Vaccine' to disrupt public perception that the 'vaccine' they are injecting is a Gene therapy treatment for a disease they don't have, and boosting themselves every 6 months to spike their T-cells and B-cells through the roof in the hope this somehow prevents serious disease of Covid 19 resulting in hospitalisation and death. EDIT 'Vaccines save millions of lives every day so if you question any of this you're a bad person.' LOl, Can't tell if this is sarcasm or not. Any hoo if one doesn't question these entirely new to market 'vaccines' that have no Long Term data yet, and willfully inject themselves and their children every 6 months and in the process continually and permanently disrupting their innate immune system function, then i'd say that one is a complete munt.