You realize that combusting Hydrogen means combining it with Oxygen, right? Burning Hydrogen makes Water. Right? Please tell me you knew that?
There wouldn't be any oxygen emitted. Just water. And it wouldn't provide energy. It would require energy.
After splitting the water molecule, only the hydrogen is needed. The oxygen produced would be quite useless and therefore purged into the atmosphere. Yes, burning hydrogen produces water but it is very minimal. The whole point to using water to power an ICE ( internal combustion engine) isn't the effeciency of energy input equalling the energy output, but that water is a FREE resource. There are government research papers available that show this is absolutely possible with an ICE and are easily found if one only does a little research.
Essentially every single sentence you just wrote, is as wrong as it is physically possible to be. "Burning" is an exothermic reaction in which a fuel combines with an oxidizer to release energy. In this case, the fuel would be Hydrogen. The oxidizer, would be Oxygen.
Literally. The only thing that is happening, when hydrogen burns, is oxygen combing with the hydrogen to form water. That's it. That's literally the entire chemical process of what "burning hydrogen" even means.
isn't the effeciency of energy input equalling the energy output, but that water is a FREE resource
If energy input doesn't equal energy output, then burning hydrogen is just a cost, that takes energy away from movement. It's just a pointless extra step that lowers MPG.
You keep pointing to the details but are missing the picture as a whole. " For their wisdom will become foolishness as they forgot to retain God in their knowledge."
(post is archived)