Take a standard gasoline engine and figure out how much pressurized hydrogen it would take to keep it running. Find an alternator capable of producing enough current to "fracture" the H2O molecule. Capture said hydrogen and pressurize it to the amount needed to run the engine. Find a suitable way to "inject" the hydrogen. Only emission would be pure oxygen. It can be done, just don't tell anyone or your life may be at risk.
You realize that combusting Hydrogen means combining it with Oxygen, right? Burning Hydrogen makes Water. Right? Please tell me you knew that?
There wouldn't be any oxygen emitted. Just water. And it wouldn't provide energy. It would require energy.
After splitting the water molecule, only the hydrogen is needed. The oxygen produced would be quite useless and therefore purged into the atmosphere. Yes, burning hydrogen produces water but it is very minimal. The whole point to using water to power an ICE ( internal combustion engine) isn't the effeciency of energy input equalling the energy output, but that water is a FREE resource. There are government research papers available that show this is absolutely possible with an ICE and are easily found if one only does a little research.
Essentially every single sentence you just wrote, is as wrong as it is physically possible to be. "Burning" is an exothermic reaction in which a fuel combines with an oxidizer to release energy. In this case, the fuel would be Hydrogen. The oxidizer, would be Oxygen.
Literally. The only thing that is happening, when hydrogen burns, is oxygen combing with the hydrogen to form water. That's it. That's literally the entire chemical process of what "burning hydrogen" even means.
isn't the effeciency of energy input equalling the energy output, but that water is a FREE resource
If energy input doesn't equal energy output, then burning hydrogen is just a cost, that takes energy away from movement. It's just a pointless extra step that lowers MPG.
The amount of energy it takes to "fracture" (as you put it) an H2O molecule is the exact same as you get from burning it. More so, because no method is 100% efficent.
It can be done and nobody will care, because you are free to waste all the energy you want. We already have electrolysis and we already have hydrogen cells. Nobody is killing anyone for having these devices. Nobody cares because they aren't as efficient as the crackpots claim they are.
Why are you so concerned with efficiancy when water is the most abundant resource on the planet? Water is free and the only emission is oxygen. Also, Jesus Christ's gift to man is free; if only you believe in Him and repent. Why do so many people reject things that are free?
You can't burn water. If you want to burn the hydrogen, you need to put energy into it to break up the molecules. The amount of energy you will need is the same amount you will get back from burning the hydrogen. Add in inefficiency, and you are losing energy. If you doubt this, then I'll trade you 3 of my quarters for one of your dollars.
Spend less time worshipping a Jew and spend more time improving yourself and protecting your people. This means closing your (((Bible))) and opening a 7th grade physics text book.
Heil Odin!
(post is archived)