WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Because they're based in the UK.

So they de-list videos and block certain terms instead deleting the videos.

Because they've had multiple hit pieces done on them in the last few years.

[–] 1 pt

Yes. Their first search engine was just so broken it could not find things anyway. Two months ago they made a new one, and while it is not perfekt, it could be dangerous for them if it finds stuff that is illegal in the UK. If they don't host the videos on western servers, they may be fine, but they have to blacklist them.

[–] 2 pts

I think that bitchute wanted to be like a YouTube competitor, not our personal based video hosting service. As you mention, being based in the UK is bad for that latter thing.

[–] 1 pt

They are too small to be a competitor, they are just the backup system for videos that in danger of getting deleted by YouTube.

[–] 0 pt

Yeah, BitChute is a great option to have and they've been there for us and they're not out right deleting everything.

They're still raising in web rankings because they're easier to use than other options and back everything up from YouTube. One of the biggest complaints is them not offering 1080p.

But we need to focus on either LBRY/Odysee or PeeTube instances. Both are open source, decentralized/federated, and p2p.