Animals can not pass disease on to humans; fleas, ticks, it does not matter.

Stopped reading there. If this were true, malaria outbreaks wouldn't be related to mosquito bites, and bugnets and insecticides wouldn't influence malaria statistics.

Besides, if you read up on old diaries, you'd notice, that pretty much everyone had fleas during ww2.

P.S.

You're inventing fake-atrocities which can be easily disproven, to create a category of "already disproven fake-atrocities" in people's minds, in which they'll intuitively put the real atrocities that have happened, and thereby diminishing them. You're like a jew that invents new bullshit-kinds of antisemitism to make it easier to discard the real arguments for just another bullshit conspiracy.

ENOUGH WITH YOUR PSYOPS YOU NIGGER

I've been looking into this idea that viruses are produced by the body in order to clean up what the bacteria, etc. cannot. It's very interesting and does make sense to me. The only thing I don't get is when there is an outbreak of a virus, if it doesn't spread, how does an area become infected? Is it simply the environmental factors that give the people who live there the same type of contamination in thier body and therefore they all produce similar viral strains with similar symptoms? That would still make sense to me but seems unlikely you'd have a surge of illness, instead you'd think it would be a steady influx of the illness. Also I wonder how many bad outbreaks of viruses there have actually been, maybe they were all bacterial. Either way I saved your comment for further reading, thanks for posting.

What about rabies? Thats eventually fatal unless you get a shot within 24 hours. I remember reading an article years back about a girl who survive rabies after being bitten by a bat in a church. Apparently the only known rabies survivor.