We've spoken about this before. Fascism is neither good nor bad. It's a tool of control. It is control. It can easily pivot, because it is control, to most any ideology. People on the left and right love fascism - even if they might lie about it. Its metric of goodness or badness is strictly determined by whomever wields that weapon. This is why when people baselessly claim fascism is universally good or bad, I know they are profoundly ignorant or a subversive.
Jews/shills/useful idiots claim fascism does not exist today. Yet those same Jews never admit the actual definition of fascism, basically admitting they know I'm right and are playing the word lawyering games to hide their actual position. An act of deception. Taking us full circle to the beginning of this paragraph.
The fact is, Obamacare is one such example of fascism (govenment + corportism) . Anyone who claims otherwise is admitting they don't know the actual definition - or are purposely deceptive.
As usual, details and context matters.
The best gov is a benevolent dictator who cares about, and takes care of his people. Shit gets done.
Example - Look at the Roman built roads. Smooth(ish) 2000 year old roads that are still working today, vs the union run USA road builders that make it last just long enough to force a repair every few years and seem to be damaged and undeveloped from the moment it is opened to traffic. "It's the trucks", well bitch trucks are gonna drive on it so make it better.
The problem is, it never lasts due to the rulers boredom, reliance on lower individuals who let powers go to their heads, corruption, and punishments. Of course bad advice from trusted advisors doesn't help.
It always seems to turn into a clusterfuck after a few decades (or less) of absolute rule.
That's correct. Transition of power is always a huge problem too. In the case of natso, it never experienced a transition of power, never established a successful track record, the citizenry, the military, and even the SS all wanted Hitler dead, believing he was purposely losing the war, and natso is basically setup to run as a monarchy - without a family. Meaning natso, even if good, is susceptible to all of the woahs of a monarchy. For the problems you lay out and for all the textbook issues recorded and taught.
There's a reason the Jews had to convert our republic into a democracy to significantly subvert us.
Long game - start with the school children saying the pledge is racist (.....and to the republic for which it stands) and non inclusive (...under God), then start calling it a democracy. I've redpilled more libs about democracy vs republic by forcing them to repeat the pledge of allegiance back to me).
Now that kids don't say it anymore, in a few decades that part will be lost to history.
(post is archived)