Is peace inherently unstable? What makes it so?
It's not unstable, just impossible considering the hostile fauna of this planet (nig and shits).
Even Aryans hunger for war, just look at what we do for entertainment, violent sport, videogame, movies...
I like to shoot beer cans in my backyard.
I liked shooting targets in my old backyard, I loved shooting clay birds with my dad and his friends.
I love watching nerds work together in a team to become the best, crushing all weaker men in their path. Watching a small team of nerds discuss the meta, min max their builds and lose to no one is an incredible feeling when theres a competitive latter. I don't think most nerds are that awesome. but when you find the right team of aryan nerds who are polite, kind, intelligent, handsome and who also have that thirst for war and to win games it's hard not to support them.
Aryans warred among themselves terribly in their history
Yes, many times just out of boredom or to "keep the troops in shape".
That's what made us strong. Imagine if our only competition were mindless idiots.
Correct. And it did not create stability. We warred over resources. Resources are why we expanded to the Americas. Those resources fueled new life into Europe.
Is peace inherently unstable?
Perhaps it's actually war that is inherently stable.
Wars are generally fought over resources (water, land, food, etc.). Notice the Jews here telling you otherwise. Notice the microcosm of Jews here confirming exactly what I told you above. There are no resources here and no need to attack anyone. I pointed out that Jews don't war over resources and I'm attacked by two Jew accounts over nothing except for pointing out Jewish tactics. Notice how they attempt to derail the point?
Jews war because it's their nature to divide, subvert, destroy, steal, and genocide. Precisely as you see the Jew accounts here doing.
Do you need more proof of both points?
(post is archived)