Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K

The basis of our present democratic parliament is not to form an assembly of wise men, but instead put together a herd of nobodies who are dependent on the intellect of everyone around them. They become easier to lead in a certain direction as their abilities decrease. This is the only way party politics can be carried on. This is the only way it is possible for the puppeteer to remain hidden in the background without ever being personally held accountable for what he does. Then, every decision, no matter how harmful to the nation, is blamed on a whole party and not just one mischievous culprit pulling the strings. All responsibility disappears because responsibility can only exist if an individual makes a decision and not an association of parliamentary windbags. Only an evil creature of the night, fearful of daylight, could approve of this institution, while every honest man who accepts personal responsibility for his own actions must find it disgusting. Consequently, this kind of democracy has become the tool of that race whose real purpose forces it to hide its actions from sunlight where others might see now and forever. Only the Jew can praise an institution as dirty and deceptive as himself.

>The basis of our present democratic parliament is not to form an assembly of wise men, but instead put together a herd of nobodies who are dependent on the intellect of everyone around them. They become easier to lead in a certain direction as their abilities decrease. This is the only way party politics can be carried on. This is the only way it is possible for the puppeteer to remain hidden in the background without ever being personally held accountable for what he does. Then, every decision, no matter how harmful to the nation, is blamed on a whole party and not just one mischievous culprit pulling the strings. All responsibility disappears because responsibility can only exist if an individual makes a decision and not an association of parliamentary windbags. Only an evil creature of the night, fearful of daylight, could approve of this institution, while every honest man who accepts personal responsibility for his own actions must find it disgusting. Consequently, this kind of democracy has become the tool of that race whose real purpose forces it to hide its actions from sunlight where others might see now and forever. Only the Jew can praise an institution as dirty and deceptive as himself.

(post is archived)

[+] [deleted] • 4 pts
[–] • 2 pts

The general talking point promoting democracy is that having all of these people involved will end up preventing tyranny. However, when the entire system is filled up with people who are bought or blackmailed (it only has to be a majority), then it begins to serve the opposite end and ensure that nothing but tyranny takes place even more so than a dictator does. If a dictator chose not to go along with something, then that would be it. Such a thing cannot happen in a corrupted democracy. They end up where they always have the majority for whatever they want.

[–] • 2 pts

The bigger question is: how did we find ourselves in a democracy to begin with? It is not mentioned once in the constitution, articles of confederation, or Declaration of Independence. We were given “a republic, if you can keep it”

[–] • 1 pt

Could this be why representative governments don't seem to last? 200-300 years?

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

Exactly. Monarchs are better. Began to figure that out a few years ago. That's what was behind overthrowing the French king, Russian tsar, and even Charles the first in England.

The Scots were shocked when Charles was executed and he actually didn't do anything wrong. Still studying all this, unfortunately history is written by the victors and it's a mess trying to figure it all out.

[–] • 3 pts

> Monarchs are better.

Only if a monarch actually cares about his people. The problem is that luxury and power can go to ones head. Even if the monarch were good, most likely the offspring would be spoiled and thus horrible monarchs themselves.

[–] • 2 pts

That's right, everything has to be qualified, there's definitely pros and cons. A good monarch is, well, good.

We're in a sinful world and there is no perfection anywhere.

[–] • 1 pt

Monarchs and dictators have a sort of selfish need to take care of what they rule over. Who wants to be king of a dung heap or if you don't keep the country strong enough to repel invaders, then you we be deposed.