With more and more people denying the holocaust, or simply asking questions for clarity, it seems strange to me that people within the jewish academia, would dare to question another holocaust of sorts. This one, being holodomor. Is this article an attempt to make all revisionist seem shameful? Is this a hit piece to lump anyone who says "it didnt happen" into the "should be fired" box?
I no longer see news as news, but rather angles to steer the collective thought patterns, and therefore set precedent.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/u-of-a-edmonton-macdonald-holdomor-1.5377661
would appreciate yalls thoughts on this.
With more and more people denying the holocaust, or simply asking questions for clarity, it seems strange to me that people within the jewish academia, would dare to question another holocaust of sorts. This one, being holodomor. Is this article an attempt to make all revisionist seem shameful? Is this a hit piece to lump anyone who says "it didnt happen" into the "should be fired" box?
I no longer see news as news, but rather angles to steer the collective thought patterns, and therefore set precedent.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/u-of-a-edmonton-macdonald-holdomor-1.5377661
would appreciate yalls thoughts on this.
(post is archived)