WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

idk what's at the bottom of it, but a fucker in a fund management told his clients to notice that oil and gas companies in bolivia didn't get the same problems over there, that the cashflow was safe basically, implying this is only a story between .gov and that particular german private enity trying to get some lithium

So I assume it was a shit deal for .gov over national resources, where a couple of .gov employees got "forced" into, with poor business ethics/practices on the "german" private side of things

Hm

In the end you get what you paid for I guess, one way or the other

Interesting. So it was money motivated?

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

It's pretty much always the case for 99% of the troops/employees involved in the operation

Now for the top 1%, the owners, the share holders, yes it's for the money, but also for more money, ie, futur control/monopoly over mines in that particular instance, because it's better like that, we're talking maximization of profit

Share holders have a more long term/strategic vision than most employees, who in the end are only mercenaries in this game

And then share holders can hold multiple shares across many companies, and it's still the same game

We're playing world monopoly/domination

And the end game is a monopoly on life, from craddle to grave, from water to air, everything

"There can be only one"