So we have to accept the opinion of another when interpreting a fact?
You don't have to accept anything, but ignoring other possibilities to serve your prejudice shows you to be a fool.
And blind to irony, since you stupidly ignored other possibilities, so you could imply that people you hate are stupid.
So you're saying the fact that the bell curve study correlates with this isn't relevant?
Im simply applying two patterns of knowledge to make a conclusion
You are simplistically taking two things that may be related, but the relationship has yet to be demonstrated, and using them to serve as "proof" for what you wanted to believe in the first place.
The bell curve is a thing, but nobody knows why, or why jews are, in the aggregate, a standard deviation higher than most other groups. You already think you know, but that's your need to feel superior, not knowledge based on actual data. Further, the bell curve deals in averages, and not in individuals. Finding out that someone is jewish does not mean he is smarter than you, it merely means the possibility is a bit more likely, until you learn what his actual intelligence is.
Also, as the article you failed to comprehend states clearly, the "mirror test" is not a test of intelligence per se, but was accepted as a measure of a certain complex abstract understanding, and now its use for that idea is called into question.
You want to believe the races you hate are inferior. And you will take any facts that support that desire, and dismiss any that don't. Making you as stupid as you imply others to be.
(post is archived)