>And I have said this elsewhere numerous times, so forgive my repetitiveness, but this is a case of social parasitism. I've had a similar realization of the parasitic quality of their behavior. Jewish history sets the stage for that comparison clearly enough. >I don't know if they completely qualify as a separate species but we can treat them as one for the purpose of this discussion. Sure. The distinction is definitely psychological and behavioral, perhaps a strained use of the word species to distinguish between strategies (or, modes of being in the world) that are perhaps different *natural kinds* - simply, a difference between the way Jews and non-Jews understand themselves in the world, and in their relationship to its natural laws and order. Broadly, there is the tendency to be authentically creative, or a tendency to parasitize. I doubt much of a case, if any, could be made phylogenetically. The Jews have been so thoroughly interbred between their various captivities and the diaspora that we are forced to go beyond mere genetics here - although, we might speculate that there is some very dominant genetic variant they share. I have no idea, really, what that might be. For what it's worth I'm picturing some polymorphism that's been duplicated such and such a number of times, and this variant could be passed on, probably maternally. I'm thinking of the situation of male pattern baldness - some theorize it is a specific SNP on the X-chromo that becomes triggered in puberty from the Y-derived effects of hormonal changes. Could whatever promotes this behavior in Jews be a genetic tendency that acts like a matrilineal 'bomb' that's just triggered by something far less specific than such and such a ratio of androgens? It would have to be one hell of a dominant allele (or set of alleles). But it's interesting to consider that possibility in the context of Jewish ethnocentrism and the way it (in combination with their being maligned by the nations of Europe historically) could have really exploded through various bottlenecks. There was a time when I knew a lot more about genetics, but as they say, use it or lose it. >They have been selecting for the ability to read and write for 2 or 3 times as long as us. Longer maybe. That is pertinent. I think these are important points. I'd widen the view beyond even reading/writing, but include number, and more importantly: the ability to *abstract*. If my foray into Jewish mysticism, which has been more or less ongoing for years, tells me anything, it's that Jews truly do not live in the same world that we take ourselves to. I had to almost crack up when Eric Weinstein started to gain some popularity, and he appeared on Rogan to discuss 'portals'. Anybody versed whatsoever in Kabbalah and Jewish exegesis recognized that mystical/abstract thread of Jewish thinking on clear display here. There is a reason that so much work in theoretical mathematics and physics has been done by Jews in the last century or two. These people literally believe that the cosmos is made by number and letter - that their Hebraic alphabet is literally the Word of God that was used to structure the universe. This flies in the face of the common sense of most people of Western descent. The Jews, in many ways, don't 'live in this world'. Their minds are always a level of abstraction above where we are living, which is why they are always behind abstract systems like our current finance system, with its explosion of instruments that are sometimes 3 and 4 levels of abstraction separated from the objects that are supposed to have the real value. >They invaded and took over half of Egypt and controlled it for generations. I don't know enough about that particular part of history to agree or disagree with characterizing it as an 'invasion'. What I do know is that the Exodus is probably not historical, at least in the sense of being a universal narrative for 'The Jews'. It's possible that a subset of Jews, led by the figure Moses, migrated out of lower Egypt back to Israel. What's unlikely is that they were 'enslaved' by Egypt. Many, many Jews chose to remain in Egypt. They liked it there. Additionally, I also believe that the tradition we so often have attributed to the Israelites, monotheism, was actually something they picked up from the Egyptians. The Jewish religion (except for perhaps two attributes) is a Canaanite scaffold upon which was strung Babylonian/Persian and Egyptian theology. From the Babylonian obsession with the power of numbers/letters to the emanationist monotheism of Egypt, the only thing that Jews added quite characteristically to it all was (a) being obsessed with an immanent apocalypse, (b) the emphasis on messianism as a political ascendancy and earthly kingdom, and (c) covenantal language and obsession with law (which was largely to blame on Babylon anyway). >Probably, why is that bird being mean to my egg, its supposed to feed my baby! It is not necessary for the parasite to be aware that it is a bad actor. That's interesting. The one caveat I'd add is I believe Jews are quite aware of their sins. Theirs is a political-theological system based on their spiritual transgression, and they have the tendency of explaining their entire history as flowing from one punishment by God to another. Here's the catch that will synthesize your claim with mine (and this relates to what I said before about *abstraction*): the reprisals against Jews, whatever kind of persecution forms they take, are always viewed *by the Jews* as punishment by God. A lot of people don't quite grasp what is implied when Jews say they are the chosen people. A big part of it has to do with God setting them apart as the *moral compass* of the world. The Jew doesn't even see non-Israeli civilizations as existing on the same level of humanity as they do. They refer collectively to all of them as The Nations. Whenever you see that Biblical phrase, it just means gentile nations. They believe God brings the nations against them for their sins. Ask any Jewish sage, and they'd tell you that the Jew is the compass that will allow you to 'read' the moral health of a nation. When the Jew begins to be persecuted, a nation is at the start of trouble. What I see happening throughout history with the Jews is this fundamental inability to explain their own outcomes in any terms other than their insular world-explanation of 'God gives or God takes'. They are always in a direct sort of antagonism with what they take to be the hand of God as the abstraction of Nations. So they are always 'pushing' in some sense, making all of their behaviors toward gentile nations *inchoate* in the legal sense. As long as they are pushing and not experiencing some sweeping reprisal, then they are in God's favor. Once they tip the scales and a nation expels them or genocides them, now God used their enemy to punish them. Once the Nations became liberal and humanized, and ideas like the value of individual lives and human rights entered the fore, the Jews started to use the examples of their historical punishments as claims of unjustified persecution. Moreover, whenever they are parasitically operating inside of a nation and anyone does point it out, they have recourse to claiming anti-semitism because, of course, God is still on their side as long as they are not being systematically killed. Because their religious history has basically embedded in their race memory the fact that they are the moral barometer of God. They are ordained to be supreme relative to everyone else, until God decides to punish them. Hence, chutzpah. They'll push until 'God' pushes back. They literally prod the nations to persecute them, and then on the basis of that reprisal, they sympathetically manipulate the next nation or generation to see them as victims. So the cycle goes. >Judaism, the other one, communism, psychotherapy, racism. I think Christianity is an exception here. Note what I said before about Judaism being a hodgepodge of other traditions. The Jews have used media and academia to pull the wool over people's eyes, claiming a historical tradition of monotheism that predates others and forms the groundwork for all of the modern 'acceptable' traditions that underlie humanism - i.e. the myth of Judeo-Christianity. The reality is they've picked and chosen religious modules from their surrounding civilizations and built a Frankenstein. Importantly, note that the other things you've mentioned, i.e. psychotherapy, are always religious *in form*. Now connect it with what I've said about abstractions. You can see that what they've done is to co-opt the *Forms* of religions. They utilize false religions. But there is a reason they hate Christianity. Christ was a spiritual liberator and redeemer, who broke down the walls the Jews had been building up in their elitist program. Christ harkened back to a purer kind of spirituality, which I attach to Egypt. Of course, no human religion is invulnerable to corruption, and so with the centuries, even Christianity has largely been corrupted because most non-Jews don't truly understand their religions (in terms of sophisticated exegesis, nor do they understand the ecumenical, liturgical and ritual parts of their traditions). So, we the gentiles get lazy, lose sight of the truth, and it simply stands as a fact that the Jew has the capability to attack a society on multiple fronts simultaneously, in subtle and patient ways. >It may only be five or ten genes that are heavily responsible for their parasitic tendencies. Are you referring to genes as molecules of DNA...or are you using it as gene qua gene (more like a 'meme'), or sets of behaviors that can be transmitted *like* they were genetically heritable? >Perhaps we can think of them a bit as a colony creature? Executing a genetic program by transmitting information between individuals the way neurons relay signals to each other. That's a very interesting way of putting it. I don't think you're 'too out there' at all. You don't need to address the following claim, but I still sense you are so close to seeing this through a spiritual lens! The notion that they are each neurons imprinted with a particular program for perceiving and transmitting information (as behavior) might be how we explain this behavior on Twitter that initially made me wonder. It could just be that the Jews (having the kind of social acumen you mentioned) innately KNOW what the primary routes of information (hence, influence) in a society are. It would be like a virus that 'knows' the tissue it is best suited to attack, and how to do that. In other words, you could take a Jew from this planet to a different planet still having human life on it, drop them there, and probably within hours the Jew would know the primary routes of cultural transmission in whatever society you dropped them in. They recognize innately, without having to consciously articulate it, that in the current state of affairs, social media is something like the 'main vein' of culture. So they are scanning it, always, looking at what their kind are doing there, and where it has been effective. They see a particular Jew mimicking white people and they observe that it is generating the desired effect. So they begin to mimic that behavior. So what's actually accounting for this problem I was describing in my previous comment is that the Jewish population is smaller, more agile, and they can simply transmit species-specific behaviors and *cues* across their population far faster than we can. It's one advantage of their smaller numbers. Americans are diverse, even where we are racially very similar. We disagree on enough things that a similar level of coordination is impossible. In part, it's because we are good at building civilizations. We are safe enough and have large enough numbers that we can *afford* to differentiate the way that we do internally. The Jewish strategy makes that impossible. Their mimicry behavior is just the outward evidence that their intra-species communications and consensus-forming apparatuses work to establish *quorum* at a velocity that non-Jews just cannot understand - because, again, we are a species that negotiates and deliberates and values the radical independence we have afforded ourselves by building something quasi-permanent. Jews couldn't exist if, as a species, they were as radically individual and deliberative. They promote democracy so often because they know that is precisely the construct that allows them to do what they do inside of a host. The kind of psychic division promoted under democracy is just what prevents a similar blanket of psychic connection from forming in their host, which they in turn rely on among themselves. The Jew, as infection, attacks the NERVOUS SYSTEM. It gets into the tissues connecting the organs together and disrupts their communications, making what was once a unified body begin to behave like a democracy, where the organ-communications only work internally and not externally to unify the body any longer. This lack of coordination in our analogy means that the body can no longer change its blood flow *efficiently*, because the body has been divided, so the body no longer sees itself as a body. Now the organs all fight for the inefficient blood flow, regardless of who needs it most. Meanwhile, the Jew in the neurons also has filaments extended into the blood vessels. It wants the blood, but it gets it indirectly by first targeting the nervous system. @PS @KingOfWhiteAmerica