Another good reason to dismiss cryptoziology out of hand is that sightings and video should have increased exponentially as camera phones increased quality, and market saturation.
Sure, there's plenty we don't know. But we can be confident that Bigfoot is much less believable today, than it was with those phony looking VHS recordings
Good point on the pervasiveness of cameras not yielding more evidence of the existence of cryptids. And to add to that, the few pictures we do get are always of very poor quality and very low resolution in a time when many gigapixel cameras are the norm not the rarity. We still see pictures of Bigfoot that look like they were captured on a 1985 Sears camcorder in ELP mode instead of high resolution HDR mega-pictures. I think this does put the nail in the "Bigfoot is real" coffin.
(post is archived)