They're not calling it a mockup, they're saying it's a copy, which was colorized.
I guess my point is that the claims made in the story are refuted by the photos themselves. They are obviously not copies of each other, unless the word "copy" in the UK means "something I invented".
They're not calling it a mockup, they're saying it's a copy, which was colorized.
I guess my point is that the claims made in the story are refuted by the photos themselves. They are obviously not copies of each other, unless the word "copy" in the UK means "something I invented".
yeah it was a real painl, i found it that it was a generated image for a 90s program about the event or something after reading like 4 articles on it
yeah it was a real painl, i found it that it was a generated image for a 90s program about the event or something after reading like 4 articles on it
Same newspaper ran another "best photo of a ufo ever taken" story for a single frame of a video shot 30 years ago in Central America. I think they're just boosting circulation with sketchy stories.
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/researchers-publish-best-image-ufo-26902115
Same newspaper ran another "best photo of a ufo ever taken" story for a single frame of a video shot 30 years ago in Central America.
I think they're just boosting circulation with sketchy stories.
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/researchers-publish-best-image-ufo-26902115
(post is archived)