Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

167

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

I don't buy it. Jesus wouldn't look like a musketeer he would more look like a fro haired camel negro with a big nose.

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah, if Jesus didn't look like all the other sand niggers, Judas wouldn't have had to point him out to the Roman soldiers.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Once you see that those are dreads then it starts coming together.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I'm christian and that is funny as fuck, I think even Jesus would chuckle over that one. :)

[–] • 0 pt

Jesus was beaten in the face. The image on the Shroud has a swollen face and a broken, swollen nose. Note the wounds on the wrists. In the Middle Ages, when the Shroud is supposed to have been faked by scientists, everyone thought Jesus had been crucified with nails through his palms. Experiment has demonstrated that the nails would have to be through the wrists to support the weight of the body.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

They need to also subtract the weight of the feet being nailed and likely the heels only barely on a tiny protrusion of wood to keep them from falling free of the cross so the weight likely would be half. Also men were incredibly more robust and solid then their tendons and muscles built with real food not todays pig waste processed food but natural food would make the body more able to hold together and if you've tried to cut meat apart then tendons and ligaments are tough as fuck like mens bodies of the past were. I think we fully underestimate our forefathers power and strength, they were mighty then unlike us pussy/weaklings you were mighty or you were dead, no guns or other equalizers then.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I don't believe anything with xrays is true.

Me and a few people in our family have had huge problems where the xray was not read right and they missed a glaring problem like one relative had a broken neck for 6 months and they just sent him home and a collapsed lung and the police were sent to inform me that I might die if I didn't go back to the hospital.

They wonder why I don't trust doctors anymore, gee that's a mystery.

Them judging a date of 2000 years accurately is impossible for me to believe at all with a device used to detect broken bones while the better ultrasound is not used in most medical cased since they are so scarce, bullshit, the thing works to good so they avoid it since they can't charge up the ass for it.

[–] • 1 pt

I've always known the Shroud of Turin is genuine. When the carbon dating came out that said it was from the Middle Ages, I knew the carbon dating was wrong. I am absolutely convinced that the Shroud is from the time of Jesus, and I see no reason why it would not be the burial shroud of Jesus himself. After all, why would the early Christian disciples save somebody else's shroud?

How did I know it was genuine? Because it is a negative image. It is imprinted on the fibers of the Shroud the way an image is imprinted on a photographic negative, the light areas being dark and the dark areas being light. They knew nothing of photographic negatives in the Middle Ages. No one faking the Shroud would have conceived of inverting the light and dark zones on it. It would not even have entered his mind.

Plus, the image on the Shroud is not paint or any kind of pigment. It is burned right into the surface of the fibers as if by some kind of chemical gas process, or perhaps a flash of light. It's not painted on. And how else would it have been made by a Medieval forger, other than with paint?

I'm convinced the Shroud is from the 1st century, and was taken from the tomb of someone who had been crucified to death. I see no reason at all why it should not be the shroud of Jesus himself.

[–] • 0 pt

Carbon dating seems so dubious, based on a bunch of assumptions that they can’t confirm.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

They anointed bodies with oil, that coated the cloth. Then it darkened as it oxidized, creating a negative image.