WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

769

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

You mean...a rock formation?

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

That's quite a leap to call something underwater, that hasn't been identified, or seen in the air an unidentified flying object.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

That's a render not a picture. I would hardly consider that accurate.

[–] 1 pt

5 miles wide? Pffft... The one that slammed into the south Pacific and severed Antarctica from South America 65 million years ago was 5 miles thick and about 400 miles wide. It must have taken a few centuries to repair after killing most life on earth.

Chicxulub hit near what is now the Yucatan Peninsula in Central America.

[–] 0 pt

This one shifted the planet's axis and sped up the day by an hour. https://pic8.co/sh/HECBtB.png

Which one? You earlier said "65 millikn years ago," which would have been when Chicxulub struck, which is not anywhere near Tierra Del Fuego, which is what's in your image.

[–] 1 pt

This is obviously a drain plug like in my tub.
Stupid goy think ocean is real.

[–] 1 pt

It's a raised formation so I'd guess it's a sedimentary layer exposed by an ocean current moving from right to left

JFYI, this isn't a satellite image. Google uses sonar composites for oceans. There are numerous anomalies and the resolution is like 1km.

Spatial resolution - When viewing an image with 1km resolution not only will you not be able to see anything that is smaller than 1km in size, but objects needs to be significantly larger than 1km for any detail to be discernable.