I am at such state of disbelief about anything what I see in news, that even if there would be video of aliens landing on earth , coming out of their ship and greeting people, I wouldn't believe this until I had seen it with my own eyes.
It is really a burden to not trust anything coming from officials (politicians, MSM, scientists, experts, analysts). Life was much more easier when I was going with the flow of mainstream.
Yeah, thanks jew for ruining even this
riuning economy was not enough
Even going off of technology that is known to exist publicly and not involving technologies suspected or indirectly known to exist in secret corporation/government projects, I am still doubtful even when viewing something naturally, in person, with my own eyes depending on the nature of what I am witnessing.
Scenario:
- Numerous spacecraft appearing all around the world in the sky aired on all of the 'news' channels.
- Internet is flooded with recordings from people's phones apparently from all around the world because each video has the voice on it speaking a different language, some male some female, some young and some old, as well as some being day recordings and some night recordings to account for people on the opposite side of the planet where it is night time also seeing and recording them.
I would call it a psyop - just bullshit CGI videos with scripted actors, especially if the voice/people in the videos appear to be a carefully selected "diverse" range of demographics of age/sex/language to hit specific target groups of viewers to instruct them how they should also react to what is shown and heard in the video. Like how a TV show had a laugh track to tell morons that something was a joke and that they should be laughing and how that evolved into the 'leading' style used in The Office of focusing in on a character that represents a target demographic to show their reaction to what just happened or was said so that the viewer of that same group is told how they are also supposed to react to it. That change in leading from a laugh track to visually showing how one should feel about what they just saw coincides with the timing of the internet being flooded with 'Reaction' videos (movie trailer reactions, opening new game system reactions, jumpscare video reactions, etc.) that are used for conditioning, dictating and reinforcing desired behavior.
If I could step out of my front door and see one in the sky myself, I would still call it bullshit holograms/projections/light manipulation, etc. If it doesn't land in front of me and I can visually see its effects on the surrounding terrain (maybe wind, scorching, impressions in the Earth, reflections on surfaces and whether it is also visible in reflections on my windows), or even be able to touch it myself - nope.
Another scenario:
- The population on one side of the planet can see a large object approach (asteroid, etc.) and crash into the Moon, causing it to be visually damaged with debris scattered into orbit around it.
- The other side of Earth who had daytime when it occurred would see recordings of it and then see its after-effects themselves later on when it is night time for them.
I'd have little initial doubt in this instance, but I would still have a little. Whether or not my doubt would drop to none or grow to be very suspicious would depend whether everything about it continues to add up and occur as would be expected (do surface effects persist and develop as would be expected; does the ejecta behave as would be expected and after the proper time for it to reach Earth, does the material affect satellites and also cause 'shooting stars'; etc.).
If it is digital in nature I immediately doubt it. If it is in person but I cannot physically interact with it, I doubt it. If it is in person but far enough away (the Moon) to where I would not expect it to be feasible to generate and maintain a persistent illusion, I tentatively accept it as real but doubt of some degree is a possibility depending on circumstances.
I would call it a psyop - just bullshit CGI videos with scripted actors,
No joke I have seen the same over the desert of AZ about a decade ago. Only one band of rotating lights. Notice how one side dims out and another appears on the other side? I saw that shit go across the horizon. Light blink out, new one blink in. Honestly this video is the best version of this which I have seen in other videos.
For clarity sake, that part of my statement that you quoted out of context was in relation to the scenario I outlined immediately above it, not to the video in the OP.
I believe life -intelligent and not- exists in abundance in the universe. I also believe intelligent life has interacted with our planet for a very, very long time.
I've witnessed a craft of the triangular form several decades ago that came in quickly, stopped 50 feet overhead briefly before altering is direction and heading off quickly to disappear in the distance mere moments later. Was that craft created and controlled by humans or non-humans? I do not and cannot know.
I suspect much of what we see that is regarded as 'unidentified' or 'unexplained' is a combination of some having a human source as well as some with a non-human source. In the instances involving a human source, I suspect a combination of both 'private' and government projects of local and foreign governments conducting various operations in each other's airspace - permitted by the other or not.
Related to that, this was a very good and very informative read:
Adversary Drones Are Spying On The U.S. And The Pentagon Acts Like They're UFOs
- https://poal.co/s/Futurology/367804
- https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/40054/adversary-drones-are-spying-on-the-u-s-and-the-pentagon-acts-like-theyre-ufos
- https://web.archive.org/web/20210523141815/https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/40054/adversary-drones-are-spying-on-the-u-s-and-the-pentagon-acts-like-theyre-ufos
- https://archive.ph/imX1E
As ardvarcus notes on that thread:
"Drones are part of the equation. So are balloons. But if you take away drones and balloons, along with hoaxes, hysteria, and misidentification, there are still UFOs that defy the laws of physics."
Though I would add "... that defy the laws of physics as we are told they are and as taught by our kiked scientific institutions and entirely based on the lies and falsehoods of kikes like Einstein."
In the instances involving a non-human source, I have ideas on their potential origins, but I also suspect not all originate from a single, extraterrestrial source/species. Considering the topic of stories and myths of subterranean civilizations throughout history, some which have evidence to support that they did exist at one time in the past and possibly still do today, I suspect there is a possibility that phenomena reported throughout time up to today could be a combination of both non-terrestrial and sub-terrestrial origins.
And that is without getting into and considering the potential of any of the additional proposed explanations for some of the phenomena; e.g. spiritual beings, dimensional beings, etc.
I can reach conclusions based on the information available, but I and almost the entirety of the world simply do not know and cannot know the ultimate truth on this subject primarily due to the efforts of those in power who control the truth of this information not wanting any of us to know. Until they no longer exist or until they no longer have power or control over the information, I do not think any of us will truly know what the truth of this and other related subjects is.
(post is archived)