From my point of view, the damage has already occurred. There's little more harm a disgruntled employee can do. Most foreign governments already know what's going on anyway.
You’re just rolling the dice that these folks are gonna honor their secrecy agreement and not volunteer to a hostile intelligence service.
Ummm.. that assumes they won't be corrupted by other actors anyway. If they don't honor their agreements, they will be in jail.
the kind of person who might do such a thing is precisely the type the agency should be removing from its ranks.
From my point of view, the damage has already occurred. There's little more harm a disgruntled employee can do. Most foreign governments already know what's going on anyway.
>You’re just rolling the dice that these folks are gonna honor their secrecy agreement and not volunteer to a hostile intelligence service.
Ummm.. that assumes they won't be corrupted by other actors anyway. If they don't honor their agreements, they will be in jail.
>the kind of person who might do such a thing is precisely the type the agency should be removing from its ranks.
(post is archived)