Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

558

According to a source the trade represents 6% of total shares and over 16%! of the float of the stock given the fact that Trump owns 60% of the company. This is a giant bet when you consider their total AUM but wait there’s more… http://fintel.io/sosh/us/djt

According to a source the trade represents 6% of total shares and over 16%! of the float of the stock given the fact that Trump owns 60% of the company. This is a giant bet when you consider their total AUM but wait there’s more… http://fintel.io/sosh/us/djt

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (10).
[–] • 3 pts

Is this still in progress? Can we "gamestop" them? That would be fantastic.

[–] • 2 pts

You sure can "Gamestop" 'em. See if blebbit will do it again.

[–] • 2 pts

If that happens, they only have $1B under management, it would ruin them.

[–] • 0 pt

does the put option not shield them from that?

[–] • 1 pt

No, I don't think it does. Rather it massively exposes them. That is kind of the point.

That is why several trading platforms told the "small investor" to fuck off and die when the gamestock thing was going on.. Because it was going to damn near bankrupt several large hedge funds that thought they had a sure thing (corrupt intentional bullshit).

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

So they are the one that sold the put, not bought it? I'f I am getting this right, the person that buys a put is saying that they will pay someone else a fee if the other person agrees, and is required to buy something from the buyer at a set price at a date of the buyer's choosing not to exceed a limit, but the buyer is not obligated to sell it. So at most the buyer could lose is whatever the fee is, and what ever the difference of the set price is, IF the set price is below the market value.