Such as what legal decisions exactly ??....
Decisions limiting the scope of governmental powers to shut down businesses, force masking, etc. Those recent past decisions.
Is EUA now verboten
EUA, if you want what they are offering. You can always refuse.
Does an employer now have to keep a worker they believe is an ongoing recalcitrant health risk to others?.
Believe whatever you want, Fire them and risk getting sued. Create a harrassing environment, get sued.
You do realize several mRNA cancer vaccines been given the green light for trials right now.
Yup. Like any experimental cure, take them at your own risk. None for me, thanks.
And normies are still getting holo-cov boosters with their flu shot without being mandated.
Ladt I read, they achieved 17% compliance with the last booster this late winter/spring before demand waned. That same crowd likely wants the annual flu shot too, no argument from me, those clapping seals have been conditioned to take the questionable hit-or-miss annual flu shot each year for the last 20+ years. No doubt they want the boosters too.
Lol, so nothing has changed then . Those few of us will still refuse and the rest will fall for the fear porn.
Nothing you said even suggests normies wont fall for the next nonsense.
Decisions limiting the scope of governmental powers to shut down businesses, force masking, etc. Those recent past decisions
Those rights were already there and enshrined in state v's fed govt law.
EUA, if you want what they are offering. You can always refuse.
Nothing has changed there. You never 'had' to take it.
Believe whatever you want, Fire them and risk getting sued. Create a harassing environment, get sued.
Again nothing has changed to 'limit' the employer, business or Govt. An aggrieved worker could always pursue a lawsuit (whether successful is another matter).
Yup. Like any experimental cure, take them at your own risk. None for me, thanks.
No shit.
But hold on remember you said >Many things have changed for the better in the information war and legal decisions.
You failed to identify any new legal decisions that have changed things for the better. In fact things have become diametrically worse in that a corrupt mRNA medical technology has been essentially given fait accompli unto the unsuspecting normie public sphere, and you're espousing 'no way they'll get away with it again' while mRNA is being advanced into mainstream consciousness and use for treatment of everything from cancer, autoimmune disease and various genetic illness.
(post is archived)