WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

556

Another eye opener for normies.

"War on Drugs."

. . The U.S. has never really been focused on reducing the drug trade in Afghanistan (or elsewhere for that matter). All the lofty rhetoric aside, the U.S. has been happy to work with drug traffickers if the move would advance certain geopolitical interests (and indeed, did so, or at least turned a knowingly blind eye, when groups like the Northern Alliance relied on drugs to fund their political movement against the regime.).” . .

Another eye opener for normies. "War on Drugs." >. . The U.S. has never really been focused on reducing the drug trade in Afghanistan (or elsewhere for that matter). All the lofty rhetoric aside, the U.S. has been happy to work with drug traffickers if the move would advance certain geopolitical interests (and indeed, did so, or at least turned a knowingly blind eye, when groups like the Northern Alliance relied on drugs to fund their political movement against the regime.).” . . [Source Article](https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/talibans-massively-successful-opium-eradication-raises-questions-about-what-us-was)

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

The CIA is the head of the global drug cartel. The CIA had the US there to protect the poppy fields and transport the heroin to Europe and the US. As soon as heroin was replaced with Fentanyl, we quickly and completely bailed on Afghanistan.

[–] 1 pt

It doesn't raise questions. It answers questions.. Of the slow, or stupid. We've all lived through the epidemic. The supply comes from there. It flooded into here.

[–] 1 pt

Ensuring that the cash crop thrived that bankrolled countless covert ops.