Did anyone even bother to read the article? Cause you cleverly edited the headline to make it completely different. He did NOT get 5 years for We build the Wall. He got 5 year for RIPPING off the money that HE was supposedly raising for the wall.
DON'T POST BULLSHIT HEADLINES. You're better than that.
Did anyone even bother to read the article? Cause you cleverly edited the headline to make it completely different. He did NOT get 5 years for We build the Wall. He got 5 year for RIPPING off the money that HE was supposedly raising for the wall.
DON'T POST BULLSHIT HEADLINES. You're better than that.
He got 5+ years for his part in We Build the Wall. He was convicted of stealing money from the donations. Yes I read the article, the headline is fine.
He got 5+ years for his part in We Build the Wall. He was convicted of stealing money from the donations. Yes I read the article, the headline is fine.
No it's not. It's a lie. He got 5 years for RIPPING Off the money. He stole the money that was supposed to build the wall You are framing it as if he got 5 years for the build the wall project. That is not accurate in any way.
No it's not. It's a lie. He got 5 years for RIPPING Off the money. He stole the money that was supposed to build the wall You are framing it as if he got 5 years for the build the wall project. That is not accurate in any way.
(post is archived)