>What you did there was state a falsity Back it up with proof. You can't. There is none. Your claim of falsity is more of you attempting to force your theory on others with 100% certainty - without any proof. >For anyone to think what you flipped as is true takes a vast amount of retardation. I flipped it to show you that you have to be able to disprove the alternate theory, which many smart people still believe. You haven't yet disproved it beyond a reasonable doubt. I can't prove or disprove it, neither can you. >To even think that he wouldn't have a dead-man's-switch I do think he had a dead-man's-switch but it was likely deactivated by Mossad. >He was a jew, he was a "puppet master" No, he was just a (((middleman))). He can and will be replaced. Mossad and (((The Bankers))) are above him at a minimum. The bankers are the true puppet masters. No one but the Devil operates above them. >The way you write you're making it seem like he's not a jew Everyone knows JE's a jew, especially you. Why do I have to be redundant when discussing him with you? >You're being fucking ridiculous. Why, because I don't buy into your THEORY 100% based on no proof? Skeptical is more like it. Like I've said, **I need proof to be 100% confident.** For the time being I see both arguments as speculative theory. Sure I have an opinion one way or the other, but I don't argue it as if it were 100% true because there is no proof available to allow me to prove it to a skeptic. I knew BB had a jewish parent or grandparent, was not aware that he flew the Lolita Express? He should have recused from everything JE related. >Tell me you have no prefrontal cortex without telling me... Do you get a big kick out of insulting people who don't agree with you 100% based on no proof, just your theory? You have a good theory there, it would be a shame if a shred of proof pops up and destroys it after your pushing it as the absolute truth, to the point of insulting those who disagree with your 100% certainty in it.