>. . . “There is a value at times to a subpoena, even if you aren’t seeking information back as a result of that subpoena. An example is how they dealt with social media companies: >Imagine being a social media company and getting a subpoena and demands saying ‘show me everything you’re doing to get these extreme views off of your platform…show me everything you’re doing to stop the next insurrection…show me everything you’re doing to look at the profile of people who support building the wall, and election integrity, and the Second Amendment, and let us know that you’re actually being good corporate citizens. >You see that’s not a subpoena intended to actually get usable information back…it’s coercive in nature.” . . . [Video Only](https://unofficialbird.com/CannConActual/status/1635313210650931202) [Source Article](https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/03/rep-matt-gaetz-reveals-shady-tactic-used-by-j6-sham-committee-that-is-coercive-in-nature-tactic-previously-used-by-rep-eshoo-and-mcnerney/)