The more I consider it, the more I think a dome is entirely the wrong shape for a magic enclosing energy shape for a flat Earth. A geometric dome shape (bing.com) is nothing more than part of a sphere, bisected with a plane.
Why on Earth (no pun intended) would a flat Earth theory use a sphere-based enclosing energy shape, when flat in this context really means anti-sphere? It's a very sphereish kind of geometric shape to take, for enclosing something that is decidedly not a sphere.
I agree completely, a good microscope unlocks a drop of pondwater into a a whole new world of reality. As does a good telescope :)
Actually in the flat earth it is an energy "sphere". It separates the waters above from the waters below. The surface only sees the above as a dome. The FE model has entire civilizations in the underground that we know nothing about. I think the "Hollow Earth" is a spin off from that. I think they used "space" to replace "water". Which would mean the universe still exists, but is water, not O2 free cold space. The "telescope" just allows people to look at the stars that are "affixed" to the firmament, and the planets are wandering stars. What is outside the bubble in water where we are, I do knot know. There are lots of different people who use Nikon P-900's to zoom in on stars. First off, if they were trillions of miles away, they couldn't zoom in. Secondly, they are not like the NASA pics, they are basically fluxing energy things. My fav looks like a cats eye, another is a 3 sided blue box. They all pulse and morph.
Cool, I am decidedly not in the FE camp but am happy to learn more of your beliefs. I note, never once did I question the size of your nose or how many countries you've been kicked out of.
lol, well my original Aryan nose has been broken 3 times in sports so I do have a bump and it is wider at that point as well. The only country I have been kicked out of is Mexico...well it was a bar right across the border in Nogales but whatever.
(post is archived)