Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

nah this is a push piece; study shows what they were paid to show

think of all the excess resources

and if it was a good idea sociologically, why aren't there all-female submarine crews? seems optimal to test it there

[–] • 1 pt

Right... But what about output of work or the willingness to self-sacrifice for the rest of the crew or mission?

[–] • 3 pts

Let's assume they do use less oxygen (from being lazy and getting less done). Any savings on oxygen will be lost on them turning up the heat, and then the air conditioning when they're on their periods.

[–] • 3 pts

Space sandwiches served on Deck 11.

[–] • 3 pts

If they're in zero gravity, they won't need males to lift the heavy stuff.

But should unexpected emergencies occur, female problem solving skills (kek) may put the mission at much greater risk of failure.

[–] • 1 pt

But they talk so much about anything and nothing that they use up the same or more oxygen in the end anyway, so there's that.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

space is Fake And Gay anyways, so what does it really matter?

[–] • 0 pt

"Houston we have a problem." "What is it?" "Well, if you can't figure it out, then never mind! We're fine!"

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

The study was negated by the use of tampons every month.

[–] • 0 pt

Fake and gay. Periods.